Blog #3 Independent
3/28/2024
Independent
This article was completely unbiased. It simply stated what happened and the reasons for why it collapsed. The tone was not very clear one way or another it did explain what happened from a factual standpoint. It begins with immediately with making it clear of the first bodies pulled from the river. It then has a recap attached describing how the crash occurred. Although many of the bias hinting at potential liability of the contractors of the bridge, were all mostly quotes. You can infer that the article leaves room for the reader to assume that the bridge may have not been fully prepared structurally. The article discussed a fuel spill as well which in my own analysis means that there are alot of things that are being hidden, not particularly by this website and article but in the situation in general. The timeline is something that the article also included that cleared up alot of different questions. Including this I think is something that is important and as a reader I realize I can analyze and come up with my own theories after seeing clear time stamps. I think this media was to simply educate the public and acted as a means of clear statistical evidence of what happened. Rather than having much voice the factual article wished to enlighten readers of the situation and what is ongoing.
Comments
Post a Comment